5 Characteristics of survey participants
Christopher Sexton and Nicole Stormon
Survey characteristics
Table 5.1. reports the characteristics of the oral health workforce by practitioner division by Ahpra at the time of the survey. DH’s had a higher proportion of the workforce in the mid-age brackets and 4.1% males. Compared to other states and territories, SA had a higher proportion of DHs. Two thirds of the DT workforce were 50 years of age or older. OHTs were younger with 44.3% less than 30 years and 42.1% 30-39 years of age. OHTs had the highest proportion of males with 12.0%.
The unweighted and weighted characteristics of survey participants are reported in Table 5.2. Survey respondents underrepresented males and those aged 60 years or older. Geographically, survey respondents from QLD and South Australia were overrepresented, whereas those from NSW, VIC, and WA were underrepresented. DHs were overrepresented in the sample, while DTs had fewer respondents.
Following adjustment, OHPs were predominantly female consisting of 91.4% of the workforce. The age distribution was negatively skewed towards younger ages, with 60.9% less than 40 years of age. The Australian states of NSW (26.1%), VIC (22.1%) and QLD (17.9%) had the largest proportions of OHPs. OHTs consisted of over half (51.7%) of the OHP workforce, followed by DHs (26.7%).
The unweighted characteristics of survey respondents by division are reported in Appendix Table 5.1.
Table 5.1. Characteristics of the oral health workforce by practitioner division by Ahpra.
|
Practitioner divisions |
||||
|
Other combination |
||||
|
N = 1,462 |
N = 671 |
N = 2,810 |
N = 384 |
N = 123 |
|
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
Age (years) |
|||||
Less than 30 |
90 (6.2) |
0 (0.0) |
1,246 (44.3) |
1 (0.3) |
63 (51.2) |
30 – 39 |
487 (33.3) |
40 (6.0) |
1,184 (42.1) |
155 (40.4) |
38 (30.9) |
40 – 49 |
482 (33.0) |
127 (18.9) |
233 (8.3) |
120 (31.3) |
18 (14.6) |
50+ |
403 (27.6) |
504 (75.1) |
147 (5.2) |
108 (28.1) |
4 (3.3) |
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
60 (4.1) |
17 (2.5) |
338 (12.0) |
37 (9.6) |
19 (15.4) |
Female |
1,402 (95.9) |
654 (97.5) |
2,472 (88.0) |
347 (90.4) |
104 (84.6) |
State of registration |
|||||
357 (24.7) |
131 (19.6) |
816 (29.3) |
56 (14.7) |
46 (37.4) |
|
218 (15.1) |
111 (16.6) |
734 (26.3) |
98 (25.7) |
31 (25.2) |
|
191 (13.2) |
113 (16.9) |
543 (19.5) |
108 (28.3) |
13 (10.6) |
|
343 (23.7) |
52 (7.8) |
292 (10.5) |
57 (14.9) |
10 (8.1) |
|
268 (18.5) |
210 (31.5) |
301 (10.8) |
52 (13.6) |
21 (17.1) |
|
18 (1.2) |
34 (5.1) |
32 (1.1) |
3 (0.8) |
2 (1.6) |
|
40 (2.8) |
8 (1.2) |
46 (1.7) |
5 (1.3) |
0 (0.0) |
|
11 (0.8) |
8 (1.2) |
23 (0.8) |
3 (0.8) |
0 (0.0) |
Table 5.2. Unweighted and weighted characteristics of the oral health workforce survey.
|
Unweighted responses |
Weighted to oral health workforce |
|
n (%) |
% (95% CI) |
Age (years) |
|
|
Less than 30 |
101 (24.0) |
25.8 (21.4, 30.6) |
30- 39 |
155 (36.8) |
35.1 (30.4, 40.1) |
40 – 49 |
82 (19.5) |
18.0 (14.5, 22.1) |
50 – 59 |
65 (15.4) |
13.6 (10.5, 17.4) |
60 or more |
18 (4.3) |
7.5 (4.6, 12.2) |
Gender |
|
|
Male |
33 (7.8) |
8.6 (6.1, 12.1) |
Female |
388 (92.2) |
91.4 (87.9, 93.9) |
State of primary practice |
|
|
91 (21.6) |
26.1 (21.6, 31.0) |
|
79 (18.8) |
22.1 (18.0, 26.8) |
|
104 (24.7) |
17.9 (14.7, 21.6) |
|
82 (19.5) |
13.9 (11.1, 17.3) |
|
42 (10.0) |
15.8 (11.9, 20.6) |
|
9 (2.1) |
1.6 (0.8, 3.2) |
|
7 (1.7) |
1.8 (0.7, 4.6) |
|
7 (1.7) |
0.8 (0.4, 1.9) |
|
Practitioner division |
|
|
132 (31.4) |
26.7 (22.6, 31.2) |
|
34 (8.1) |
12.3 (8.8, 17.0) |
|
223 (53.0) |
51.7 (46.5, 56.9) |
|
25 (5.9) |
7.0 (4.6, 10.4) |
|
Other combination |
7 (1.7) |
2.3 (1.1, 4.8) |
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency
Dental Hygienists
South Australia
Dental Therapists
Oral Health Therapists
Queensland
New South Wales
Victoria
Western Australia
Oral health practitioner
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory
Confidence interval