"

8 Secondary place of employment

Nicole Stormon

Key Takeaways

This chapter reports the characteristics of respondents’ secondary place of employment.

  • Two-thirds of OHP’s did not have secondary place of employment.
  • There was a high proportion of younger practitioners working in public practice as secondary employment.

Secondary place of employment

Figure 8.1. presents the weighted percentages of the sector of secondary place of employment by professional division. Two-thirds of OHP’s did not have secondary place of employment. Those that did report secondary employment were more often in the private and specialist service sector. Appendix Table 8.1 reports the unweighted characteristics of survey participants secondary place of employment.

Figure 8.1. Weighted sector of secondary place of employment by division

 

Secondary place of employment by demographics

Table 8.1. reports the characteristics of those with a secondary place of employment. For those with a secondary place of employment, there was a higher proportion of those younger than 39 years of age (59.4%) in private practice than older age groups. Public sector secondary employment had a high proportion of those less than 30 years of age (60.8%). Age followed a similar trend amongst private and public practice as a secondary place of employment.

Table 8.1. Weighted characteristics of the oral health workforce secondary place of employment.

 

Private

Public

Specialist
services

Research,

Education

& Management

Other

 

%

(95% CI)

%

(95% CI)

%

(95% CI)

%

(95% CI)

%

(95% CI)

Age (years)

 

 

 

 

 

    Less than 30

22.9

(13.5, 36.0)

60.8

(35.8, 81.2)

12.2

(4.4, 29.5)

26.4

(11.5, 49.9)

67.5

(32.9, 89.8)

    30 – 39

36.5

(25.4, 49.2)

21.6

(7.7, 47.4)

34.6

(18.1, 55.8)

26.6

(12.1, 48.8)

7.9

(1.0, 42.1)

    40 – 49

19.2

(11.3, 30.6)

9.5

(2.1, 34.1)

31.6

(16.1, 52.7)

27.8

(13.1, 49.8)

7.2

(0.9, 39.9)

    50 – 59

19.1

(10.9, 31.3)

8.1

(1.9, 28.8)

12.9

(3.6, 36.5)

7.9

(2.5, 22.8)

17.5

(3.8, 53.4)

    60 or more

2.4

(0.3, 15.2)

0.0

(0.0, 0.0)

8.8

(1.3, 42.1)

11.2

(3.3, 31.8)

0.0

(0.0, 0.0)

Gender

 

 

 

 

 

    Male

16.4

(8.7, 28.8)

14.1

(3.2, 45.1)

16.4

(5.2, 41.1)

4.8

(0.7, 27.6)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

    Female

83.6

(71.2, 91.3)

85.9

(54.9, 96.8)

83.6

(58.9, 94.8)

95.2

(72.4, 99.3)

100.0

(100.0, 100.0)

State of primary practice

    NSW

23.5

(14.1, 36.4)

11.7

(2.8, 37.9)

15.5

(5.7, 35.9)

31.8

(15.3, 54.7)

15.5

(2.1, 61.1)

    VIC

20.7

(11.9, 33.6)

40.1

(18.8, 65.9)

25.3

(11.5, 46.9)

22.0

(8.6, 45.9)

10.9

(1.4, 51.2)

    QLD

14.5

(8.3, 24.1)

6.3

(1.5, 23.4)

23.9

(11.8, 42.3)

20.7

(9.6, 39.2)

17.3

(3.8, 52.4)

    SA

23.6

(15.2, 34.7)

7.1

(1.6, 25.9)

18.0

(6.3, 41.7)

13.4

(5.3, 30.0)

13.8

(3.0, 45.3)

    WA

14.2

(6.6, 28.0)

34.8

(14.3, 63.2)

14.9

(3.9, 43.1)

12.1

(3.0, 37.4)

42.5

(12.6, 79.2)

    TAS

2.1

(0.5, 8.3)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

    ACT

1.4

(0.2, 9.2)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

2.3

(0.3, 15.2)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

    NT

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

Years practicing

    Less than 10

48.6

(36.2, 61.1)

75.7

(50.5, 90.5)

38.8

(21.4, 59.6)

51.5

(31.2, 71.3)

81.8

(45.6, 96.0)

    10-19

27.3

(17.8, 39.5)

13.2

(3.3, 40.7)

22.2

(9.8, 42.9)

27.0

(12.7, 48.6)

7.2

(0.9, 39.9)

    20-29

13.8

(7.0, 25.3)

6.3

(1.5, 23.4)

6.9

(1.7, 24.3)

13.4

(4.7, 32.9)

10.9

(1.4, 51.2)

    30 or more

10.3

(4.5, 22.1)

4.7

(0.6, 27.8)

32.1

(15.1, 55.7)

8.0

(1.8, 29.6)

0.0

⁑ (0.0, 0.0)

Proportions were computed using weighted data.
⁑ Estimates equated to zero based on survey responses and weighting. However, there may be low numbers of actual practitioners in this group.

Interpretation

The findings in this chapter are similar to previous workforce reports on OHPs (Stormon et al. 2020). This chapter highlights a trend where younger OHPs are more likely to engage in secondary employment, particularly in private and specialist sectors. This phenomenon could be influenced by several factors. Younger OHPs may be more inclined to seek additional employment to gain experience in the public sector where scope of practice may be more diversely utilised and provide professional networks and support. Literature on early career development supports this, indicating that younger professionals are generally more proactive in seeking supplementary roles to advance their careers (Nash et al. 2014).

Mid-career OHPs engaging in secondary employment within private and specialist practice may reflect a strategic approach to balancing family commitments as well as the availability of part-time roles within these sectors.

 

Sources

  • Nash DA, Friedman JW, Mathu-Muju KR, Robinson PG, Satur J, Moffat S, Kardos R, Lo ECM, Wong AHH, Jaafar N, van den Heuvel J, Phantumvanit P, Chu E, Naidu R, Naidoo L, McKenzie I, Fernando E. 2014. A review of the global literature on dental therapists. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 42: 1–10.
  • Stormon N, Tran C, Suen B. 2021. Australian oral health workforce: the oral health professions workforce survey 2020.

 

definition

Licence

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Australian Oral Health Workforce Copyright © 2025 by Stormon, Do and Sexton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.