Maximising your chances of getting published

Assess fit with the journal

#EditorObservations 03 Assess fit with the journal (YouTube, 1m 36s)

Every journal has a specific orientation. This orientation is typically outlined in the Aims and Scope section of the journal webpage, which is easily accessible to authors. My observation over the past eight years is that authors pay less attention to the fit between the research study they would like to publish and the orientation of the journal. Instead, it seems that authors have developed a habit of sending manuscripts relatively randomly from one journal to the next, in the hope that they will get lucky eventually. I would argue that this is not a promising strategy. It is very labour-intensive to prepare a paper for submission to a new journal, so it is best to avoid having to resubmit a paper to a new journal too many times. A more effective approach is to already have a journal in mind when conducting the study. This is the most natural approach. As researchers we usually contribute to a specific body of work, which tends to be published in specific outlets. As we familiarise ourselves with the relevant literature, inevitably, some journals will stand out as being the main contributors to discussions around the topic. Those are good journals to target.

Before submitting, I would recommend reading the Aims and Scope of the potentially suitable journals in detail to see if the alignment is good. For example, the journal I co-edited, Annals of Tourism Research, has a strong focus on theory development. It does not publish applied research. This does not mean that Annals does not believe that applied research is important. It is important. It is valuable. It can create important change. But Annals of Tourism Research does not publish this type of work. Its sister journal, Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, does – it is focused specifically on applied tourism research. Yet, about 20% of the articles submitted to Annals of Tourism Research are primarily making an applied contribution, often within limited geographical boundaries. Submitting such an article to Annals of Tourism Research is a waste of time for the authors.

The #editorobservations in this section illustrate the different ways in which manuscripts can misalign with the target journal. Such misalignment already reduces publication chances.

 

#editorobservation…

πŸ€”…🀨…😩

Response message excerpt. Details below.

 

#editorobservation

Yes, Annals of Tourism Research published some bibliometric studies.

But generally we do not publish them.

Citation potential is not the key here.

Bibliometric studies often lack the depth of review articles written by experts who have immersed themselves in a research field.

 

Message response extract. Details below.

 

#editorobservation

Below is another kind of email Scott McCabe and I have to send regularly.

We are not quite sure why people are so excited about writing book reviews.

Is it possible they think it counts as a publication? πŸ˜• πŸ˜• πŸ˜• πŸ˜• πŸ˜•

 

Message response excerpt. Details below.

 

#editorobservation

Sad side-effect of Publish or Perish culture: we are so desperate to publishΒ that we just shoot manuscripts to one journal after the other

  • submit
  • desk rejected
  • submit elsewhere
  • desk rejected

Not a success strategy

Paper never a good fit with any journal.

 

Message response excerpt. Details below.

 

#editorobservation

Some journal editors are offended when it’s obvious that a study was not specifically intended to contribute to knowledge in their field.

Scott McCabe and I are not offended.

We just wished authors did their homework before redirecting their manuscripts.

 

Excerpt from message response. Details below.

Licence

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Observations of a Journal Editor Copyright © 2026 by The University of Queensland is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.